ted演讲稿 5篇

TED演讲,也称为“TED演讲”,指的是**technology, entertainment, design…

TED演讲,也称为“TED演讲”,指的是**technology, entertainment, design 大会(美国的一家私有非营利机构组织的科技传播会议)上的演讲**。

TED演讲通常由在某个特定领域内有影响力的人发表,例如科学家、创业者、创新者、艺术家等。演讲内容通常以一个引人入胜的开头开始,然后通过具体的例子、故事、实验或预测来传达演讲的核心信息。

演讲稿是演讲者为特定场合而准备的有目的性的讲话文稿,是演讲者在特定的场合针对特定的对象表达特定观点和主张而事先准备好的演讲词。所以,TED演讲稿就是演讲者为在TED大会上发表演讲而准备的材料。以下是有关于ted演讲稿的有关内容,欢迎大家阅读!

ted演讲稿 5篇num

ted演讲稿1

You’relookingatawomanwhowaspubliclysilentforadecade.Obviously,that’schanged,butonlyrecently.

ItwasseveralmonthsagothatIgavemyveryfirstmajorpublictalkattheForbes30Under30summit:1,500brilliantpeople,allundertheageof30.Thatmeantthatin1998,theoldestamongthegroupwereonly14,andtheyoungest,justfour.Ijokedwiththemthatsomemightonlyhaveheardofmefromrapsongs.Yes,I’minrapsongs.Almost40rapsongs.

Butthenightofmyspeech,asurprisingthinghappened.Attheageof41,Iwashitonbya27-year-oldguy.Iknow,right?HewascharmingandIwasflattered,andIdeclined.Youknowwhathisunsuccessfulpickuplinewas?Hecouldmakemefeel22again.Irealizedlaterthatnight,I’mprobablytheonlypersonover40whodoesnotwanttobe22again.

Attheageof22,Ifellinlovewithmyboss,andattheageof24,Ilearnedthedevastatingconsequences.

CanIseeashowofhandsofanyoneherewhodidn’tmakeamistakeordosomethingtheyregrettedat22?Yep.That’swhatIthought.Solikeme,at22,afewofyoumayhavealsotakenwrongturnsandfalleninlovewiththewrongperson,maybeevenyourboss.Unlikeme,though,yourbossprobablywasn’tthepresidentoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica.Ofcourse,lifeisfullofsurprises.

NotadaygoesbythatI’mnotremindedofmymistake,andIregretthatmistakedeeply.

In1998,afterhavingbeensweptupintoanimprobableromance,Iwasthensweptupintotheeyeofapolitical,legalandmediamaelstromlikewehadneverseenbefore.Remember,justafewyearsearlier,newswasconsumedfromjustthreeplaces:readinganewspaperormagazine,listeningtotheradio,orwatchingtelevision.Thatwasit.Butthatwasn’tmyfate.Instead,thisscandalwasbroughttoyoubythedigitalrevolution.Thatmeantwecouldaccessalltheinformationwewanted,whenwewantedit,anytime,anywhere,andwhenthestorybrokeinJanuary1998,itbrokeonline.ItwasthefirsttimethetraditionalnewswasusurpedbytheInternetforamajornewsstory,aclickthatreverberatedaroundtheworld.

WhatthatmeantformepersonallywasthatovernightIwentfrombeingacompletelyprivatefiguretoapubliclyhumiliatedoneworldwide.Iwaspatientzerooflosingapersonalreputationonaglobalscalealmostinstantaneously.

Thisrushtojudgment,enabledbytechnology,ledtomobsofvirtualstone-throwers.Granted,itwasbeforesocialmedia,butpeoplecouldstillcommentonline,emailstories,and,ofcourse,emailcrueljokes.Newssourcesplasteredphotosofmeallovertosellnewspapers,banneradsonline,andtokeeppeopletunedtotheTV.Doyourecallaparticularimageofme,say,wearingaberet?

Now,IadmitImademistakes,especiallywearingthatberet.ButtheattentionandjudgmentthatIreceived,notthestory,butthatIpersonallyreceived,wasunprecedented.Iwasbrandedasatramp,tart,slut,whore,bimbo,and,ofcourse,thatwoman.Iwasseenbymanybutactuallyknownbyfew.AndIgetit:itwaseasytoforgetthatthatwomanwasdimensional,hadasoul,andwasonceunbroken.

Whenthishappenedtome17yearsago,therewasnonameforit.Nowwecallitcyberbullying(网络欺凌)andonlineharassment(网络骚扰).Today,Iwanttosharesomeofmyexperiencewithyou,talkabouthowthatexperiencehashelpedshapemyculturalobservations,andhowIhopemypastexperiencecanleadtoachangethatresultsinlesssufferingforothers.

In1998,Ilostmyreputationandmydignity.Ilostalmosteverything,andIalmostlostmylife.

Letmepaintapictureforyou.ItisSeptemberof1998.I’msittinginawindowlessofficeroominsidetheOfficeoftheIndependentCounselunderneathhummingfluorescentlights.I’mlisteningtothesoundofmyvoice,myvoiceonsurreptitiouslytapedphonecallsthatasupposedfriendhadmadetheyearbefore.I’mherebecauseI’vebeenlegallyrequiredtopersonallyauthenticateall20hoursoftapedconversation.Forthepasteightmonths,themysteriouscontentofthesetapeshashungliketheSwordofDamoclesovermyhead.Imean,whocanrememberwhattheysaidayearago?Scaredandmortified,Ilisten,listenasIprattleonabouttheflotsamandjetsamoftheday;listenasIconfessmyloveforthepresident,and,ofcourse,myheartbreak;listentomysometimescatty,sometimeschurlish,sometimessillyselfbeingcruel,unforgiving,uncouth;listen,deeply,deeplyashamed,totheworstversionofmyself,aselfIdon’tevenrecognize.

Afewdayslater,theStarrReportisreleasedtoCongress,andallofthosetapesandtrans,thosestolenwords,formapartofit.Thatpeoplecanreadthetransishorrificenough,butafewweekslater,theaudiotapesareairedonTV,andsignificantportionsmadeavailableonline.Thepublichumiliationwasexcruciating.Lifewasalmostunbearable.

Thiswasnotsomethingthathappenedwithregularitybackthenin1998,andbythis,Imeanthestealingofpeople’sprivatewords,actions,conversationsorphotos,andthenmakingthempublic–publicwithoutconsent,publicwithoutcontext,andpublicwithoutcompassion.

Fastforward12yearsto20XX,andnowsocialmediahasbeenborn.Thelandscapehassadlybecomemuchmorepopulatedwithinstanceslikemine,whetherornotsomeoneactuallymakeamistake,andnowit’sforbothpublicandprivatepeople.Theconsequencesforsomehavebecomedire,verydire.

IwasonthephonewithmymominSeptemberof20XX,andweweretalkingaboutthenewsofayoungcollegefreshmanfromRutgersUniversitynamedTylerClementi.Sweet,sensitive,creativeTylerwassecretlywebcammedbyhisroommatewhilebeingintimatewithanotherman.Whentheonlineworldlearnedofthisincident,theridiculeandcyberbullyingignited.Afewdayslater,TylerjumpedfromtheGeorgeWashingtonBridgetohisdeath.Hewas18.

MymomwasbesideherselfaboutwhathappenedtoTylerandhisfamily,andshewasguttedwithpaininawaythatIjustcouldn’tquiteunderstand,andtheneventuallyIrealizedshewasreliving1998,relivingatimewhenshesatbymybedeverynight,relivingatimewhenshemademeshowerwiththebathroomdooropen,andrelivingatimewhenbothofmyparentsfearedthatIwouldbehumiliatedtodeath,literally.

Today,toomanyparentshaven’thadthechancetostepinandrescuetheirlovedones.Toomanyhavelearnedoftheirchild’ssufferingandhumiliationafteritwastoolate.Tyler’stragic,senselessdeathwasaturningpointforme.Itservedtorecontextualizemyexperiences,andIthenbegantolookattheworldofhumiliationandbullyingaroundmeandseesomethingdifferent.In1998,wehadnowayofknowingwherethisbravenewtechnologycalledtheInternetwouldtakeus.Sincethen,ithasconnectedpeopleinunimaginableways,joininglostsiblings,savinglives,launchingrevolutions,butthedarkness,cyberbullying,andslut-shamingthatIexperiencedhadmushroomed.Everydayonline,people,especiallyyoungpeoplewhoarenotdevelopmentallyequippedtohandlethis,aresoabusedandhumiliatedthattheycan’timaginelivingtothenextday,andsome,tragically,don’t,andthere’snothingvirtualaboutthat.ChildLine,aU.K.nonprofitthat’sfocusedonhelpingyoungpeopleonvariousissues,releasedastaggeringstatisticlatelastyear:From20XXto20XX,therewasan87percentincreaseincallsandemailsrelatedtocyberbullying.Ameta-analysisdoneoutoftheNetherlandsshowedthatforthefirsttime,cyberbullyingwasleadingtosuicidalideationsmoresignificantlythanofflinebullying.Andyouknowwhatshockedme,althoughitshouldn’thave,wasotherresearchlastyearthatdeterminedhumiliationwasamoreintenselyfeltemotionthaneitherhappinessorevenanger.

Crueltytoothersisnothingnew,butonline,technologicallyenhancedshamingisamplified,uncontained,andpermanentlyaccessible.Theechoofembarrassmentusedtoextendonlyasfarasyourfamily,village,schoolorcommunity,butnowit’stheonlinecommunitytoo.Millionsofpeople,oftenanonymously,canstabyouwiththeirwords,andthat’salotofpain,andtherearenoperimetersaroundhowmanypeoplecanpubliclyobserveyouandputyouinapublicstockade.Thereisaverypersonalpricetopublichumiliation,andthegrowthoftheInternethasjackedupthatprice.

Fornearlytwodecadesnow,wehaveslowlybeensowingtheseedsofshameandpublichumiliationinourculturalsoil,bothon-andoffline.Gossipwebsites,paparazzi,realityprogramming,politics,newsoutletsandsometimeshackersalltrafficinshame.It’sledtodesensitizationandapermissiveenvironmentonlinewhichlendsitselftotrolling,invasionofprivacy,andcyberbullying.ThisshifthascreatedwhatProfessorNicolausMillscallsacultureofhumiliation.Considerafewprominentexamplesjustfromthepastsixmonthsalone.Snapchat,theservicewhichisusedmainlybyyoungergenerationsandclaimsthatitsmessagesonlyhavethelifespanofafewseconds.Youcanimaginetherangeofcontentthatthatgets.Athird-partyappwhichSnapchattersusetopreservethelifespanofthemessageswashacked,and100,000personalconversations,photos,andvideoswereleakedonlinetonowhavealifespanofforever.JenniferLawrenceandseveralotheractorshadtheiriCloudaccountshacked,andprivate,intimate,nudephotoswereplasteredacrosstheInternetwithouttheirpermission.Onegossipwebsitehadoverfivemillionhitsforthisonestory.AndwhatabouttheSonyPicturescyberhacking?Thedocumentswhichreceivedthemostattentionwereprivateemailsthathadmaximumpublicembarrassmentvalue.

Butinthiscultureofhumiliation,thereisanotherkindofpricetagattachedtopublicshaming.Thepricedoesnotmeasurethecosttothevictim,whichTylerandtoomanyothers,notablywomen,minorities,andmembersoftheLGBTQcommunityhavepaid,butthepricemeasurestheprofitofthosewhopreyonthem.Thisinvasionofothersisarawmaterial,efficientlyandruthlesslymined,packagedandsoldataprofit.Amarketplacehasemergedwherepublichumiliationisacommodityandshameisanindustry.Howisthemoneymade?Clicks.Themoreshame,themoreclicks.Themoreclicks,themoreadvertisingdollars.We’reinadangerouscycle.Themoreweclickonthiskindofgossip,themorenumbwegettothehumanlivesbehindit,andthemorenumbweget,themoreweclick.Allthewhile,someoneismakingmoneyoffofthebackofsomeoneelse’ssuffering.Witheveryclick,wemakeachoice.Themorewesaturateourculturewithpublicshaming,themoreaccepteditis,themorewewillseebehaviorlikecyberbullying,trolling,someformsofhacking,andonlineharassment.Why?Becausetheyallhavehumiliationattheircores.Thisbehaviorisasymptomoftheculturewe’vecreated.Justthinkaboutit.

Changingbehaviorbeginswithevolvingbeliefs.We’veseenthattobetruewithracism,homophobia,andplentyofotherbiases,todayandinthepast.Aswe’vechangedbeliefsaboutsame-sexmarriage,morepeoplehavebeenofferedequalfreedoms.Whenwebeganvaluingsustainability,morepeoplebegantorecycle.Soasfarasourcultureofhumiliationgoes,whatweneedisaculturalrevolution.Publicshamingasabloodsporthastostop,andit’stimeforaninterventionontheInternetandinourculture.

Theshiftbeginswithsomethingsimple,butit’snoteasy.Weneedtoreturntoalong-heldvalueofcompassion–compassionandempathy.Online,we’vegotacompassiondeficit,anempathycrisis.

ResearcherBrenéBrownsaid,andIquote,”Shamecan’tsurviveempathy.”Shamecannotsurviveempathy.I’veseensomeverydarkdaysinmylife,anditwasthecompassionandempathyfrommyfamily,friends,professionals,andsometimesevenstrangersthatsavedme.Evenempathyfromonepersoncanmakeadifference.Thetheoryofminorityinfluence,proposedbysocialpsychologistSergeMoscovici,saysthateveninsmallnumbers,whenthere’sconsistencyovertime,changecanhappen.Intheonlineworld,wecanfosterminorityinfluencebybecomingupstanders.Tobecomeanupstandermeansinsteadofbystanderapathy,wecanpostapositivecommentforsomeoneorreportabullyingsituation.Trustme,compassionatecommentshelpabatethenegativity.Wecanalsocounteracttheculturebysupportingorganizationsthatdealwiththesekindsofissues,liketheTylerClementiFoundationintheU.S.,IntheU.K.,there’sAnti-BullyingPro,andinAustralia,there’sProjectRockit.

Wetalkalotaboutourrighttofreedomofexpression,butweneedtotalkmoreaboutourresponsibilitytofreedomofexpression.Weallwanttobeheard,butlet’sacknowledgethedifferencebetweenspeakingupwithintentionandspeakingupforattention.TheInternetisthesuperhighwayfortheid,butonline,showingempathytoothersbenefitsusallandhelpscreateasaferandbetterworld.Weneedtocommunicateonlinewithcompassion,consumenewswithcompassion,andclickwithcompassion.Justimaginewalkingamileinsomeoneelse’sheadline.I’dliketoendonapersonalnote.Inthepastninemonths,thequestionI’vebeenaskedthemostiswhy.Whynow?WhywasIstickingmyheadabovetheparapet?Youcanreadbetweenthelinesinthosequestions,andtheanswerhasnothingtodowithpolitics.

Thetopnoteanswerwasandisbecauseit’stime:timetostoptip-toeingaroundmypast;timetostoplivingalifeofopprobrium;andtimetotakebackmynarrative.It’salsonotjustaboutsavingmyself.Anyonewhoissufferingfromshameandpublichumiliationneedstoknowonething:Youcansurviveit.Iknowit’shard.Itmaynotbepainless,quickoreasy,butyoucaninsistonadifferentendingtoyourstory.Havecompassionforyourself.Wealldeservecompassion,andtolivebothonlineandoffinamorecompassionateworld.

Thankyouforlistening.

[

ted演讲稿2

沉重的悲痛是无法避免的,无论什么途径都无法避免死亡。

制作更多身体和心灵的空间,让生命焕发全部光彩。

我们选择的不是坐以待毙,而是让变老和死亡变成一场追逐走向高潮的华丽乐章。

虽然没有长生不老的药,但是我们可以设计通向死亡的路,像一场解放运动,让你意识到,你总能在剩下的生命中找到惊艳之美或者生命的意义。

我们疯狂的热爱某一些时刻,也许,我们可以学着活得更精彩,不是为了避免死亡,而是为了向死而生。

让死亡带领我们前行,而不是想象力的荒芜之地引领我们。

菲菲有感:西方人对死亡抱着坦然的态度,而中国人因为传统文化的影响,一直忌讳死亡,甚至与之相关的词都觉得特别不吉利。

现代医院关注“病”,却很少关注“人”。

濒临死亡的患者,除了疾病带来的痛苦,还有内心的折磨,内心的折磨本是属于非必要的痛苦,怎么来将它剔除呢?怎么把握身体任何一丝残存的感官用力的感受这个世界和生命给予我们的美好瞬间?怎么给自己设计一条无悔的死亡之路呢?死亡是我们生命必经的一部分,要学着让自己活的更好更精彩,而不是为了避免死亡。

ted演讲稿3

一个天生口吃的女孩,站在TED的讲台上,她要说她的故事,唱她的歌。这令我感触不少。

先说一说,看完这场演讲,我脑中闪现的两句话。第一句“上帝为你关闭一扇门,必定为你打来一扇窗。”第二句“太多的选择,反而让人无所适从。”

人有天生的差别,只是差别而已,不是差距。很多客观的、现实的因素,我们无法改变。我们能做的就是找到“上帝给我们开的那一扇窗”,并好好利用这扇窗。如果,你是一个有心人,你能透过这扇窗观看整个世界,也能让世界发现你的存在。而有些幸运的人,即使上帝给他们开了很多门,或许他们也从未走到门外去看看外面的世界。因为他们已经拥有很多门,足以看到许多风景,何必到外面经历没有屋檐的漂泊。所以,透过门看到的世界,不一定就比透过窗看到的世界更精彩。

我又想起美国诗人罗伯特·弗罗斯特的《未选择的路》“黄色的林子里有两条路,很遗憾我无法同时选择两者。”不管一个人年轻的时候有多少选择的机会,最终我们只能走一条路。而且,至于另外一条未选择的路,几乎从此就无缘再见。不管多年我们如何叹息,我们只能选择一条路,而且我们这一生已经被自己选择的`路改变了。另一条,只是遗憾,它也不一定就比我们选择的路更迷人。所以,不管是给定的路,还是能选择的路,过后都会或多或少留下遗憾。因为,一切没能经历的,错过的事,都会让我们怀念。假如当时我选择了另外一条路,或者我可以选择另外一条路??

总之,我们选择的路,或者被选择的路,就造成不同的人生,不同的我们。不管怎样,接受自己吧,真实的自己最特别。

再说一下这场演讲《这一次是TED演唱,因为演讲真的很恐怖!》主角MeganWashington,这个和我们有一点不同的女孩。她从小口吃,却发现唱歌能让她流畅地表达自己。她选择了唱歌,唱歌成就了她。来到TED讲台上,她没有用她培训过的“SmoothTalking”来做一场完美的演讲,即使她能够这样,也没有刻意的取乐观众。她让一个真实的自己显现在观众面前。我从她的眼神中,看到坦然、平静和坚定。

看完她的TED演讲,我搜到她唱歌的一些图片,和她的演讲一样,没有太多做出来的成分,一样的自我,或者忘我于她的音乐,她的内心情感。还有她的歌曲也如她本人一样,没有夸张表演,没有声嘶力竭的呐喊,好似平静的诉说,诉说她的期盼和隐忍。

正如她在演讲结尾时所说的“这不是TED演讲,是TED演唱”,好吧,我们可以这样站到世界的舞台上,让世界看到真实的自己。做自己吧,做到极致,世界都会认可你。

ted演讲稿4

看了这个视频

惊呀的发现我的观念是如此的美国化——

演讲中谈到了美国人性格习惯中的三个假设:

第一个假设:

如果选择与你息息相关,那么必须自己拿主意,只有这样才能保证个人的喜好兴趣得到充分的考虑,而这恰恰是成功的关键。在美国,选择主要由个人做出。人人听从自己意愿,甚至不考虑别人的喜好或建议,我们称之为"忠于自我"。

第二个假设:反映出美国人对于选择的观念,即方案越多,选择越优。

第三个假设:也许是最有问题的一个假设,"永远不要拒绝选择"。

我得承认一点,我就是这么想的!

当然主讲人SheenaIyengar提示我们

这些假设都是有局限性的

第一种假设“选择必须由自己做出,以保证个人的喜好兴趣得到充分的考虑”

局限性在于在于,

如果对像是非英美国家的人,

自主选择并非能带来最大的效率。

非英美国家的人更注重为集体利益而作出的选择。

想起20岁时做的人生规划

4个字的定位

真我!幸福!

不就与英美人的“忠于自我”理念如出一辙?

看看从小自大的人生经历

的确是一个在亚洲社会看起来过于自私的人

其实我还可以举出另一个例外

就是欧美人重视家庭更甚于工作与事业

从幼儿园毕业典礼到小学、中学、大学毕业典礼

父母是不会缺席的

工作再忙也要有每周的家庭日

旅行、露营、带孩子去认识大自然、周游世界也要背上两三岁的孩子

晚上还要给孩子讲睡前故事

我很欣赏欧美国家的这种“重视家庭”观念

这点说明欧美人结婚之前与结婚之后是两种观念

结婚前是极端的“忠于自我”

结婚后是极端的“忠于家庭”

第二种的假设“方案越多,选择越优”

我也深有体会

像选一个长年奋斗的城市

我会有计划的把大陆30多个省市走遍

最后才选定上海

当然我也上了理念的当

SheenaIyengar说

“选择的价值就取决于,我们能感受到可选物之间差异的能力。当人们被予以十种以上选择时,他们往往表现更糟,无论这些选择关乎卫生保健、投资,还是其他什么关键领域。”

比如说对于婚姻的选择就是

我有幸遇到了对我好的各类型的女孩

可爱的、漂亮的、贤惠的、淑女的、干练的、青春的、精明的、温柔的、甚至女强人……

可惜自己摆脱不了那种看选项的心态

结果就是

错过错过错过

一个算不上不受异性欢迎的人

落得个长年形单影只

有意思的是

那些女孩随后大多都迅速步入婚姻

生活得既幸福又美满

这也许是我唯一值得欣慰的事吧

第三种假设"永远不要拒绝选择",

讨论的是极端情况下的两难选择问题,

特别是谈及伦理问题时(一个选项是死亡另一个选项是植物人),

我们应该理性面对极端问题!

而且并不以小概率事件去否定自主选择的主要意义!

看完这个讲座

我会发现选择的局限性

”选择绝对性”并非完美的理论

感谢那位盲人学者

让我拓宽了思维的边界

但是剔除了那些遥远的边界情况

自主选择基本理念的重要意义还是不变的!

ted演讲稿5

凯莉演讲的《如何使压力变成朋友》,我听了很有感触,对我有促进作用,更可以让我们适应这个节奏快、压力大、早就已经开始好久的21世纪。

我们都处在这个社会里,压力来自不同的方面,但给我们造成的结果是一样的,会使我们焦虑不安,情绪错乱。作为心理专家的凯莉做过一个调查研究:相信压力有害健康吗?五年之后,那些相信的人,大多死亡。凯利说这并不是压力导致的,而是他们的”相信”导致。(peoplewhoexperienedalotofstress.butdidnotviewstressasharmfulwerenomorelikelytodie.)过去,凯莉也把压力当作一个敌人,拼命地去驱赶它,而现在她转换视角,把面对压力时的紧张,汗水,心慌,看作是身体充满活力,并准备好应对这一压力的表现,那是怎么的心情呢?

你跳动的心是为你的行动在准备着,少一些焦虑,多一些信心,把压力当做你的朋友!

当你改变你对压力的概念,你便能改变你身体对于压力的反应。”Inolongerwanttogetridyourstress.Iwanttomakeyoubetteratstress.thisismybodyhelpingmerisetothischanllenge."这些反应是我身体在帮助我应对这些挑战。

这些“压力”也会促使我们释放催产素,也叫“拥抱素”,所以当我们面对压力时,会不经意喜欢和朋友、邻居聊天,关心身边的人,其实这也是对压力的一种释放。

演讲者语气很温和,幽默风趣,用新的角度去看待一件让人苦恼的事,而这个所谓的“压力”其实却是一个正能量!正应了“有压力才有动力”,都是满满的正能量!

除此之外,我还想推荐的是马特•卡茨《尝试做新事情30天》,作者用很短的时间,讲述了一个有趣,有意义的’话题。有一些我认为对自己有用也能让大家收益的话,做了摘抄。

1、你常想在生命中做的事30天刚好是这么一段合适的时间,去养成一个新的习惯或者改掉一个习惯。

2、取代了飞逝而过、易被遗忘的岁月,这段时间非常的令人难忘。

3、随着我开始做更多的,更难的,30天里具有挑战的事,我的自信心也增强了。

4、如果你真想做一些糟糕透顶的事,你可以在30天里做这些事。

5、当我做到一些小的、持续性的事,我可以不断尝试做新的事。我学到我可以把它们更容易的坚持下来,事实上,它们乐趣无穷!

关于作者: 学习啦

为您推荐

发表回复